اهداف و کارکردهای کنسولگری بریتانیا و تعامل آن با کمپانی هند شرقی در شیراز (1925–1903 م/ 1344–1321 هـ. ق)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه تاریخ دانشگاه شیراز

2 دانشیار گروه تاریخ دانشگاه شیراز

10.22111/jsr.2019.4669

چکیده

از سدۀ 19م. سیاست انگلستان در ایالت فارس، ایجاد امنیت در راه‌‌های ارتباطی با هدف توسعۀ تجارت بود. در این راستا دولت بریتانیا اقدام‌به تأسیس یکی از سازمان‌‌های هماهنگ‌کننده به‌نام «کنسولگری» کرد. این پژوهش برآنست با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی درپی پاسخ به این سؤال باشد که کنسولگری بریتانیا در شیراز، درصدد دست‌‌یابی به چه اهداف و کارکردهایی بود و نحوۀ تعامل آن با کمپانی هند شرقی چگونه بود؟ یافته‌‌های پژوهش بیانگر آن است که قصور دولت مرکزی و فقدان قدرت محلی در فارس، باعث ایجاد ناامنی در راه‌ها شد که درنتیجه به تجارت بریتانیا زیان‌‌هایی وارد کرد. این مسأله کنسول‌‌ها را بر آن داشت تا برای حفظ منافع خود و برقراری امنیت، دست به اقداماتی بزنند؛ ازجمله، دخالت در امور داخلی حکومت فارس، تصمیم به تجزیۀ آن، برقراری روابط مستقیم با سران قبائل و عشایر، اعزام قشون هندی، دادن اولتیماتوم به دولت مرکزی و اخطار به حکام محلی مبنی‌بر دخالت نظامی و تشکیل نیروی مستقلی به‌نام «پلیس جنوب». کنسولگری بریتانیا در شیراز در مأموریت خود از ظرفیت‌های نظامی، مالی و اداری کمپانی هند شرقی بهره می‌برد و تحت ادارۀ کل سیاسی هند بود و سخنگوی کمپانی، در دستگاه اداری فارس استقرار داشت. صادرات به بمبئی و دیگر بنادر مهم هند، از‌طرف فارس صورت می‌گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Objectives and functions of the British Consulate and its interaction with the East India Company in Shiraz (1925-1903 / 1344- 1321 AH)

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyed mirabdolrezahosseiny 1
  • hamid hajiyan pour 2
1 History Department of Shiraz University
2 Associate Professor, Department of History, Shiraz University
چکیده [English]

Expanded abstract
1. Introduction
This study investigated the British Consulate in Shiraz (in Fars Province) in the interval 1903-1925/1321-1344 AH. Iran is located in an area where European states had colonial objectives in the early nineteenth century. The strong economic-political rivalries between these European countries in that period caused them to expand their spheres of influence using tools including establishment of consulates. Therefore, it is important to demonstrate the role and the position of these consulates in changing the political attitude of Britain toward Iran and to show the guiding role of the Consulates in this relation. Study of practical measures taken and reports sent by the Consulates to the British government in London and to the British Raj reveals the important political-commercial objectives they followed and reported. The main purpose and question in the present research is to investigate the objectives and functions of the British Consulate in Shiraz. Although it is obvious that the British government established the Consulate in Shiraz, as one of its most important centers of influence, to promote its colonial objectives in this city, one of the main purposes of this research is to identify the colonial methods and the strategy the British government adopted for expanding its policy in the Fars region.
 
2. Methodology
This research addressed the rivalries between colonial states, especially Britain, and the establishment of the British Consulate in Shiraz in Iran in the framework of the theory of colonization. Therefore, the study was fundamental in purpose and analytical and descriptive in methodology. Obviously, it mainly employed a library- and document-based method to collect information and used first-hand historical sources, travelogues, the works of chroniclers, published correspondence of secret agents of foreign countries, and the Fars Weekly as its sources.
 
3. Findings
The Consulate in Shiraz was inaugurated by General George Graham and supervised by European officers (Lorimer, 2009:270; Rabino (1984:139). Up to the year 1925 /1344 AH, it had nine Consuls or Vice-consuls with the ranks of general, colonel, and captain and some with the titles of Major and Lieutenant (Rabino, ibid; The Discovery of English Tricks or Duplicity and Falsehood, based on British Secret Documents on Iran, Kianfar, Einollah and Estakhri, Parvin, 1984:133).
     When the British came to power in Fars Province, one of the publications with a high circulation named the Fars Weekly was published from 1916-1919/ 1335-1338 AH under the management of Mirza Fazlollah Banan, the secretary and translator of the Consulate. On the front page of the weekly was printed “This newspaper publishes the official news of the South Persia Rifles.” All official notifications of the civil and military representatives of the British Government and of the East India Company in Fars were printed in this weekly (the Fars weekly, 1916-1919/1335-1338 AH). During this period, trade was as important for the British government as the establishment of consulates and the appointment of consuls (Watson, 1961:99). The most important objective of the British government was to create order and security along the trade routes with the purpose of expanding trade. This policy inevitably influenced the situation in Fars. There were important trade routes in Fars that connected the trade areas of central Iran to India and to the southern margins of the Persian Gulf. The most famous one of these was the Bushehr-Shiraz road (Safiri, 1985:30). Shiraz also benefited greatly from this increase in trade activity both in terms of the connecting roads and with respect to consumer goods (Curzon, 2008:2/122-123).       
     According to the report by Knox D’Arcy, the Vice-Consul in Shiraz Consulate from 1908 to 1912, there were 14 British Companies that engaged in trade in Fars (The Blue Book, 1984:1622-6/7). Moreover, trade documents of the British Consulate in Shiraz during 1913-1014 regarding trade benefits led to a substantial amount of correspondence between the Consulates in Shiraz and Bushehr and the governments in Delhi and London. In general, one basic issue was followed in all this correspondence: to drive out non-British trade from Iran (Kianfar, Einollah and Estakhri, Parvin, ibid, 1984:165).
     The Consuls also had general oversight of the financial affairs of Fars Province. From 1911/1329 AH onward, the provincial government in Fars became more dependent on yearly British financial aid to run its foreign affairs, and the British Consul became the honorary person in charge of supplies in Fars Province (Wright, 1979: 121-122). The Europeans in Shiraz were the heads of government offices in Shiraz and dictated without consulting with the Governor of Fars. Daryabeigi, the military commander, obeyed the Consul in the hope of becoming the ruler of the Southern Ports in the Persian Gulf. The telegraph offices, also supervised by the Consul, reported the daily events (Mokhber-ol-saltaneh, 1984:318-324).
 
4. Results
Consulates were one of the organizations that the British established in line with colonial rivalries to gain political-economic benefits. Therefore, as a vast Province in southern Iran with sensitive geographical position and an important position in world trade, Fars was the focus of attention for European Powers and became an arena of colonial rivalries. Shiraz attracted Britain’s attention because it was the trading center of southern Iran and played an active role in domestic and foreign trade. There were many British nationals in Shiraz. They took control of purchase and sale of various commodities with the establishment of the Consulate, trading houses and trading companies and extended their influence in this region. This consulate had extensive functions because of the weak central government, tactless local rulers, rivalries between the clans and tribes, and lack of suitable administrative organizations in the Province. The Consuls had general oversight of the telegraph offices, the Imperial Bank of Persia, the financial offices, the representatives of trading companies, the military and law and order affairs, and the communication of warnings issued by the British government regarding their interests. The Consulates also built infirmaries, collected manuscripts and antiques, carried out geographical, political, and economic mapping, became familiarized with the cultural-social affairs and cultures, and acquired information regarding military and financial resources. The Consuls gave consular support to those who took sanctuary and to religious minorities and provided medical services to the public to win people over on the one hand and followed the policy of sowing discord among the nomadic and tribal leaders on the other hand. They acted as kings without crowns, took measures and engaged in undiplomatic behavior (not only to appoint or dismiss rulers but also to meddle in all general and specific affairs in Fars Province), and dictated their wishes. The measures taken by Britain in Fars were mostly based on economic and commercial considerations, and their social-cultural and service provision activities were aimed at acquiring popularity, prestige, and influence.
     The value of this research lies in its functional aspects that can be useful for scientific-academic circles, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Security Commission, the Strategic, Security, and Economic Centers and, finally, for public enlightenment.
 
5. References (in Persian)

Amin, Abdul Amir, British interests in the Persian Gulf, translation by Ali Rajabi, Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1988.
Anvari, Amirushang, Gulf, Tehran: House of History, 2011.
Obun, Eugene, Iran Today, 1906-1907, translated by Ali Asghar Saeedi, Zwar, 1983
O’Connor, Frederick, Memories of Frederick O’Connor, translated by Hassan Zanganeh, Tehran: Shiraz Publishing House, 1997
Boroumand, Safoura, British Consulate General in Bushehr 1763-1914/1177-1332 AH, Tehran, Journal of the Center for Documentation and Diplomatic History of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2002
..........British Consulate General in Bushehr, Foreign Relations History Quarterly, year 1, No. 1, winter 1999. pp.31-48.      
.......... British Consulate General and Arms Trade in the Persian Gulf (1890-1914), Foreign Relations History Quarterly (year 3, No. 1, spring 2002, pp. 75-86)
Banan, Mirza Fazollah, the Fars Weekly. Year 2, No. 21, 1917/1336 AH.p.10.
......................................Year3, No. 22, 1918/1337AH.pp.11-12,No.20,pp.4-5,No,21.p.3,NO.23.p.12,No.25,p.8,No.26,p.12,No.32,p.12
..................................... Year 4, No. 20, 1919/1338 AH.p.6.
Hosseini Fasaei, Mirza Hassan, Farsnameh Naseri, corrected and annotated by Mansour Rastegar Fasaei, 2 volumes, Amirkabir Publications, 1997
Khalesi, Abbas, the History of Sanctuary and Taking Sanctuary, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishers, 1987
Gustavo Domorini, Nomads of Fars province, translated by Jalaluddin Rafi Far, Tehran University Publications, 1996
Robino, Louis, Diplomats and Representatives of Iranian and British Consulates, translated by Gholam Hossein Mirza Saleh, Tehran: History of Iran, 1984
Wright, Dennis, the British among the Persians, translated by Manuchehr Tahernia, Tehran: Ashtiani Publications, 1985
.......... the British among the Persians, translated by Eskandar Deldam, Tehran: Nahal Publications, 2000
Raine, Esmaeil, Iranians on British Payroll, Tehran: Javidan Publications, 1977
Razi, Monireh, Southern Police, Tehran: Islamic Revolutionary Guards Documentation Center, 2002.
-Roknzadeh Adamitat, Mohammad Hossein, Fars and the International War, two volumes, Tehran: Iqbal Publications, 1978
-Sykes, Sir Percy Mellsworth, History of Iran, translated by Mohammad Taghi Fakhr Dai Gilani, volume 2, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishers, 1983
Saeedi Sirjani, Ali Akbar, Vaghaye Ettefaghiyeh, Reports of British secret agents, Tehran: Peykan Publications, 1982
Florida Safiri, the South Persia Rifles, translated by Mansoureh Ettehadiyeh and Mansoureh Jafari Fesharaki, Tehran: Publication of Iranian history,1985
Savori, Roger, Iran under the Safavids, translated by Kambiz Azizi, Tehran: Sahar Publications, 1987
Dagobert von Mikush, Wassmuss the German Lawrence, translated by Freshteh Azam Mirfakhrai, Tehran: Navisa Publications, 1996
Blue Book: The British Department of State’s Secret Reports on the Constitutional Revolution in Iran, complied by Ahmad Bashiri, volumes 1-8, Tehran, Nashrno, 1988
George Nathaniel Curzon, Persia and the Persian Question, translated by Gholamali Vahid Mazandarani, 2 volumes, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishers, 2008
The Discovery of English Tricks or Duplicity and Falsehood, compiled by Kianfar, Einollah and Estakhri, Parvin, 1984
Gehrke, Ulrich, Ahead to the East, translated by Parviz Sadri, Book I, Tehran: Siamak Publications, 1998
Hugo de Groot, Travelogue, translated by Mohammad Jalilvand, Tehran: Markaz Publications, 1990
Philippe Graves, Cox Headquarters Mission in the Persian Gulf and Persia, translated by Hasan Zanganeh, Tehran: Behdad Publications, 2001
Ann KS Lambton, History of Islamic Persia, translated by Yaghoub Azhand, Tehran: Amirkabir Publications, 1984
J.G. Lorimer, Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf, Volume I, translated by Abdulhamid Ayati, Tehran: Iranian Studies Foundation Publications, 2001
Wilhelm Leiton, Iran’s Peaceful Influence to Mandate, translated by Maryam Mirahmadi, Tehran: Moeen Publications, 1988
Masaharu Yoshida, the Travelogues of Masaharu Yoshida, translated by Hashem Rajabzadeh, Mashhad Astan Quds Razavi Printing and Publishing, 1994
Majd, Mohammad Gholi, Persia in World War I and Its Conquest by Great Britain, translated by Mostafa Amiri Tehran: the Political Studies and Research Institute, 2011.
Hedayat, Mehdi Gholi (Mokbbar-al-Saltanah), Memories and Risks, Tehran: Zavar, 2010.
------------------------------------------------------------Iran Report, Tehran: Silver, 1984.
Watson, Robert Grant, A History of Persia in the Qajar Period, translated by Abbasgoli Azari, Tehran: Bina Publications, 1981
Wilson, Arnold, Wilson Travelogues, translated by Hossein Ali Sa ́adat Nouri, Vahid Publications, 1984.

 
References (in latin)
1-            Bullard.R.The Middle East a political and economic survey, Oxford University press London New Toronto: 1951.
2-            Degoey, Ferry. "The business of consuls, consuls and business men". Erasmus University Rotterdam. Faculty of his tory and art, 2010
3-            Lorimer, J.G, Gazetter of the Persian Gulf, Oman, and Central Arabia, Completed and edited by R.L.Bird Wood, Calcutta, 1970.
4-            Stebbin, H.L. (2009). British Consuls and “Local” Imperialism in iran, 1889-1921, phD Dissertation: University of Chicago.
5-            -Windler, Chris. "Diplomatic History as Field for Cultural. Analysis: Muslim- Christian Relations in Tunis, 1700-1840 ". The Historical Journal 44: 1, 2001.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Great Britain
  • Consulate
  • Shiraz
  • Trade
  • Security