نقد بررسی دیدگاه قرآن‌گرایان شبه قارّه پیرامون زکات

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

3 مربی علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

چکیده

قرآن کریم و سنت پیامبر و امامان معصوم علیهم‌السلام دو منبع اصلی استخراج احکام دین هستند. مسلمانان ابتدا در این مسئله اختلافی نداشتند؛ اما پس از ارتحال آن یگانۀ دوران، عده‌ای ندای کفایت قرآن سر‌دادند و این تفکر تا عصر کنونی با فراز و فرود ادامه یافت. در دو قرن اخیر برخی قرآن‌گرایان با گرایش به رأی و بی‌اعتنایی به سنت، در احکام دین ازجمله زکات اختلاف کردند؛ هرچند گزارش‌هایی نیز مبنی‌بر قرآن‌گرایی در قرن اول و دوم هجری ارائه شده است. نوشتار حاضر با روش توصیفی-‌تحلیلی به طرح و نقد استدلال‌های قرآنیون دربارۀ زکات از آیات قرآن پرداخته‌است و نتیجه می‌گیرد: قرآن‌گرایان با انکار حجیت سنت و گرایش به رأی‌گروی و عقل‌گرایی افراطی دست به برداشت‌های ذوقی از آیات قرآن کریم زده، احکام زکات را به چالش کشیده و با دست‌کشیدن از ظواهر معتبر قرآنی به تأویل جهت‌دار و توجیه رأی‌مدارانه روی ‌آورده‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Review and Critique on Viewpoints of the Subcontinental Qur'anicists on Zakat

نویسندگان [English]

  • hosain khakpour 1
  • abdolmajid zelnaroei 2
  • gholamreza razavi doost 3
1 Associate Professor of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
2 Master student of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
3 Instructor of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The tradition of the Prophet (pbuh) after the great Qur'an has been the most credible and reliable criterion for extracting the precepts(laws) of religion. From the very beginning, due to following the Prophet and through perseverance, Muslims extracted the religion's precepts and therefore there was no division and differentiation among Muslims in religion's precepts. Over the recent two centuries, some dissidents (Quranists) With tendency to their opinions and disrespect for the tradition(Sunnah), differed in all religion's precepts including Zakat. However, there have been reports of Quranicism in the first and second centuries of the AH. The present article uses a descriptive-analytical method to express and criticize the Quranists' reasonings about Zakat based on Qur'an's verses and it concludes: The Quranists, by denying the authority of tradition and the tendency to their opinions and rationalism, have tried to comment  the Qur'an's verses subjectively according to their opinions, challenged the Zakat laws and they giving up the Quran's credited evidences directed to subjective and justificational interpretations based on argumental intellect.
 

Introduction

Although the extreme Qur'anicism is emerging and the result of some modernism movements in the past two centuries, the background of the thought of Qur'anic sufficiency can be related to during and after the demise of the Prophet (PBUH) (Khakpour et al., 1396: 70). Bukhari and Moslem’s report on opposition to the writing of hadith on the eve of the death of the Messenger of God and the words of the second caliph to justify this opposition (... according to the book of God) (Bukhari, 1400 AH, vol. 1, p. 54) confirms this. After the demise of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) in the first century AH, evidence has emerged that there are traces of the sufficiency of the Qur'an and disregard for tradition in the knowledge of religion. Quraysh’s opposition to Abdullah ibn Umar ibn As for writing the hadiths of the Prophet (PBUH) (Khatib Baghdadi, 2016 AH, p. 80) and Sunni’s report on the prediction of the companions' opposition to the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH) in the hadith of Erika (Neyshabouri, 1420 AH, vol. 1) P. 191; Sajestani, 1410 AH, vol. 4, p. 200) are signs that some companions did not believe in the authenticity of the Prophet's tradition. In such hadiths, the Messenger of God (PBUH) states: It will not be too late for some people to lean on the thrones and claim the sufficiency of the Qur'an and the lack of need for the Sunnah of the Prophet. After political movement of caliphs, It is attributed to the deniers of the tradition (Shafi'i, 1403 AH, vol. 7, p. 28). Some of them have been considered as a tribe of the Mu'tazilites of Basra (Khezri, 1373 AH, p. 185; Saba'i, 1405 AH, p. 148) and a number of Kharijites of that era (Elahi-Bakhsh 1409 AH, p. 95; Azami, 1401 AH, vol. 1, p. 23). Ibn Qutaybah goes on to mention a number of people who consider the tallow and skin of pigs to be halal because the Qur'an only mentions the sanctity of its meat (Ibn Qutaybah, 1405 AH, p. 59). In the eighth century, this thought dominated, too (Shatebi, 1423 AH, p. 679). In the thirteenth century, this thought emerged as an organized and coherent flow in the Indian subcontinent and some Islamic lands (Khakpour et al., 1396, 71).  Hafiz Aslam Jarajpour and Ghulam Ahmad Parviz are among the theorists of the Qur'an in the Indian subcontinent in the contemporary period. One of the topics Quranists tended to voting is Zakat. The present study is an attempt to analyze and critique their views based on Quranic verses.
Research questions:

What is the viewpoints of Quranists on zakat and its rules?
What are the problems on the thought of Quranists?

1.1. Research Methods
The present research has been done by descriptive-analytical method with Quranic-narrative approach. NOORMAGS) and other databases. In analyzing the data, first the view points of Quranists from the original sources on the issue of Zakat are collected and then their viewpoints on Quranic verses with arguments from the original sources of Sunnis and Shiites have been criticized and evaluated.

Discussion

The Qur'anists disagree on zakat; Most of them have criticized the hadiths and narrations of Zakat and some of them have reflected on it and tried to provide an alternative to what they have criticized. Abdullah Jakralavi did not say anything clearly about the quorum of zakat, the time of obligatory zakat and whether zakat is obligatory every day or every month or every half year, and only about the amount to be given to the poor and needy. It is necessary to have spoken. According to him, zakat is one tenth of property, whether it is the product of work and trade or the product of agricultural land, giving this one tenth as zakat is obligatory. The followers of Balagh al-Qur'an have said about the common quota of zakat: "The jurisprudential quorum of zakat is reminiscent of the capitalist system and has nothing to do with the Qur'anic system. Khajeh Ahmad al-Din says about the time of payment of zakat: "A person who receives a salary, we should receive zakat from him on the day of receiving his salary ... and there is no need to wait for a year and such an expectation also has a benefit.
The Qur'anic view of Zakat can be summarized in the following four areas. 1- The amount of zakat with the founder of the sect of Ahl al-Dhikr and the Qur'an and the followers of the sect of Balagh al-Qur'an is to give one tenth of the cash and agricultural products. 2- The amount of zakat for the later Qur'anists is property that is in excess of need. 3- Zakat has no quorum at all. 4- According to Parviz and the followers of Balagh Al-Quran, whenever the government rules only according to the Quran, the duty of paying zakat is transferred from individuals to the government.
Criticism of this view can be said: Belief in zakat on property in the religion of Islam is an integral part of religion and one of its necessities to the extent that denying it leads to denying the principle of religion, and denying it is considered infidel. It is specified by the Prophet of Islam (PBUH); it is the consensus of all Muslims. The biggest mistake of the Qur'an is to violate the verses of the Qur'an. Including verse 7 of Surah Al-Hashr. Because in this verse, he asks the Muslims to do what the Prophet of God, peace and blessings of God be upon him, said. On the other hand, the Qur'an often states the general rules and regulations and the explanation of its details is left to the Messenger of God (PBUH) (Nahl; 44). For this reason, the Qur'an does not deal with the details of prayer, zakat, Hajj, etc., for example, how many rak'ats of daily prayers should be recited, or when and with what quorum zakat should be paid, is not mentioned in the Qur'an, but in the life of the Messenger of God (PBUH) is determined by conditions such as a certain quorum and the passage of one year. The Qur'an's opinion on how to perform this duty is quite obvious. Some of the Qur'anic thoughts and doubts, such as the theory of delivering the means of production to the government and the idea of paying zakat every day, are not worth criticizing and become clear to the reader. Because the believers of this view have not provided any evidence from the Qur'an to prove their claim.

Conclusion

The Qur'anic scholars, just as they have expressed their views on many issues such as prayer and fasting, have also been caught in the debate on zakat in extracting the religious details from the Qur'an. Tenth is considered in general property, agriculture and industry and it is said that God in verse 65 of Anfal considers the ratio of the number of Mujahideen believers to infidels as one tenth and in verse 111 repentance from jihad with wealth along with jihad with life and the body has mentioned; Therefore, the legal quorum of zakat on property, which is a kind of almsgiving and spending, will be one tenth. This misinterpretation of the verses of the Qur'an indicates the extremist view of this flow to the role of the Arabic language of the Qur'an in interpretation or the same (trust in the Arabic word in the description of the contents). It is noteworthy that these terms have a history in the culture of the Arabs and previous religions, and despite this, their quality has been distinct in Islamic law. Therefore, the Prophet (PBUH) has considered his practical method in tasks such as zakat, prayer, etc. as a model for believers.

References

The Holy Quran
Abdul Baqi, Muhammad Fuad. (1995). The indexed dictionary of the words of the Holy Qur’an; In the footnote of the Holy Qur’an. 1 c. Tehran: Islamic.
Al-Bayan Magazine. (1951). Lahore, Al-Amr tasriyah.
Arshi, Mohammad Hussein. (1975). Quran Si Quran Tak, Lahore: Nami Publication.
Azami, Mohammad Mustafa. (1966). Darasat fi Hadith al-Nabawiyyah al-Sharif and Tarikh Tadwineh, Riyadh, Riyadh Publication.
Azdi, Abu Dawud Ibn Sulayman Ash'ath. (n.d.). Sunan Abi Dawood, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Ismail. (1400AH). Al-Jame 'Al-Sahih, Beirut: Dar Al-IHya Al-Tarath Al-Arabi.
ElaHibakhsh, Khadem Hussain. (1409AH). Al- Quranun wa Shobahatehem Haul Al- Sonnah, Al-Ta’if: Al-Siddiq Library.
Haskani, Obaidullah ibn Abdullah. (1411AH). Shavahed Al- Tanzil Li Ghavaid Al- Tafzil, Ministry of Culture and Islamic, Printing and Publishing Institute - Iran - Tehran.
Horr Ameli, Muhammad ibn Hassan. (1409AH). Vasayl Al-Shiah, Aal Al-Bayt Institute, Qom.
Ibn Abi Hatim, Abdul Rahman Ibn Muhammad. (1419AH). Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Azeem (Ibn Abi Hatim), third edition, Nizar Mustafa Al-Baz Publication, Saudi Arabia - Riyadh.
Ibn Hajar, Ahmad Ibn Ali. (2001). Fath al-Bari Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari, Cairo: maktabah, Salafi.
Ibn Qutaybah, Abdullah. (1405AH). Tavil Al-Mokhtalef Al-Hadith, Beirut.
Ibn Umar, Ali. (1966). Sunan al-Dar Qatani, Cairo, Dar al-Mahasin Press.
Ibn Zakaria, Abu al-Hussein Ahmad ibn Farsi. (1404AH). Mojam Al- Maghayees Al- Loghah, Qom, Islamic advertisements Office.
Jakralwi, Abdullah. (1906). Tarjomeye Al- Quran Bi Ayat Al-Furqan, Setim Islamic publication, Lahore.
Jakralwi, Abdullah. (n.d.). Masaleh of Zakat, Office of Quranic Propagation, Publication.
Khakpour, Hossein. (2012). Modernist Currents in Continental India, Journal of Subcontinent Reseaches, 4(11).
Khakpour, Hossein., Zell'Narouyi, Abdul Majid., RazaviDoost, Gholamreza. (2017). Critique and Study of the Subcontinental Quranists' Opinions on Prayer, Journal of Subcontinent Reseaches, 9(30).
Khatib al-Baghdadi, Ahmad Ibn Ali. (2016). Taqid al-Al-Ilm, research: Yusuf al-Marashli, Beirut al-Al- Ihya al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, Publication.
Khezri, Mohammad. (1373AH). Tarikh Al- Tashri Al- Islami, Cairo, Al-Istiqamah Publication.
Maqbool Ahmad, Sayed. (1952). Motalee Al- Hadith, Ilahe Abad of Hindustan, Abbas library.
Mazrou'a, Mahmoud Muhammad. (2005). Shobahat Al- Quraniin Haul Al- Sonnah AL- Nabawiah, The Al- Tawhid Group,
Najafi, Saheb Al-Jawaher, Muhammad Hassan. (1404AH). Jawaher Al- Kalam fi Sharh Sharaye Al- Islam, Seventh edition, Dar Ihya Al- Torath Al- Arabi, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nishapuri, Muslim. (1420AH). Sahih Muslim, Beirut: Dar Ihya Al- Torath Al- Arabi.
Parviz, Gholam Ahmad. (1978). Quranic Laws, Lahore, Brentenk Scientific Publication.
Parviz, Ghulam Ahmad. (1373AH). Qurani Faisali, Lahore, Ashraf Publication.
 Ragheb Isfahani, Hussein Ibn Mohammad. (1373AH). Mofradat Al- Alfaz of Quran, Mortazavi, Tehran.
Razi, Fakhreddin. (n.d.). Al-Tafsir Al-Kabir, Tehran, Publication of the Scientific Book.
Saba'i, Mustafa. (1405AH). Al- Sunnah Wa Makanateha, Beirut: Islamic School.
Sajistani, Abu Dawud Sulayman ibn Ash'ath. (1410AH). Sunan, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr.
Sanaani, Abdul Razzaq Ibn Homam. (1411AH). Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Aziz Al-Moasama Tafsir Abdul Razzaq, Dar Al-Marafa - Lebanon - Beirut.
Shafi'i, Muhammad ibn Idris. (1403AH). Kitab al-Alom, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr.
Shatibi, Ibrahim Ibn Musa. (1423AH). Al- Mowafeghat Fi Osoul Al- Shariah, Beirut, Dar al-Kotob al-Arabi.
Sobhi, Mansour, Ahmad. (2006). Al-Quran wa Kafa Masdar al-Sharia Al-Islami, Beirut: Al-Arabi Publishing Institute.
Tabarsi, Fazl Ibn Hassan. (1993). Majma Al-Bayyan fi Tafsir Al- Qur'an, Tehran: Nasser Khosrow Publications.
Tabatabai, Mohammad Hussein. (1995). Al-Mizan, translated by Seyyed Mohammad Baqer Mousavi, Qom: Teachers Association.
Tavassoli, Mohammad Ismail. (2007). Zakat and its effect on economic growth and development, Research Institute of Hauzeh and University.
Timimi, Yahya bin Salam. (1425AH). Tafsir Yahya bin Salam Al-Timimi Al-Basri Al-Qirwani, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Almiyah, Muhammad Ali Bayzun Publications - Lebanon - Beirut.
Toreihi, FakhrAl-din. (1408AH). Majma Al-Bahrain, Publishing office of Islamic Culture.
Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hassan. (n.d.). Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir AL- Qur'an, Dar Al-Ihyaa Al-Torath Al-Arabi - Lebanon - Beirut.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Qur'anicist
  • Subcontinental
  • Zakat
  • Denial of Sunnah
قرآن کریم.
ابن حجر، احمدبن علی. (1380). فتح الباری شرح صحیح البخاری، قاهره: مکتبه السلفیه.
ابن زکریا، ابوالحسین احمدبن فارسی. (1404). معجم مقابیس اللغه، قم: دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی.
ابن عمر، علی. (1966). سنن الدار قطنی، قاهره: طبع دارالمحاسن.
ابن قتیبه، عبدالله. (1405). تأویل المختلف الحدیث، بیروت.
ازدی، ابوداودبن سلیمان اشعث. (بی‌تا). سنن ابی داود، بیروت، دارالفکر.
اعظمی، محمدمصطفی. (1966). دراسات ‌‌فی‌‌ حدیث ‌‌النبوی ‌‌الشریف ‌‌و تاریخ ‌‌تدوینه، ریاض: مطابع الریاض.
بخاری، محمدبن اسماعیل. (1400). الجامع الصحیح، بیروت: دارلاحیاء التراث العربی.
پرویز، غلام احمد. (1373ق). قرآنی فیصلی، لاهور: مطبعه اشرف.
پرویز، غلام احمد. (1978). قرآنی قوانین، ط2، لاهور: مطبعه علمی برنتنک.
توسلی، محمداسماعیل. (1386). زکات و اثرآن بر رشد و توسعۀ اقتصادی، پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
جکرالوی، عبدالله. (1906). ترجمة القرآن بآیات الفرقان، مطبیع اسلامیة ستیم: لاهور.
جکرالوی، عبدالله. (بی‌‌تا). مسأله الزکات، اداره بلاغ القرآن، نشرالاداره.
خاکپور، حسین. (1391). جریان‌های‌‌ نوگرا‌‌ در شبه‌‌قاره ‌‌هند، ‌‌مطالعات ‌‌شبه‌‌قاره، 4(11).
خاکپور، حسین؛ ظل‌‌ناروئی، عبدالمجید؛ رضوی‌‌دوست، غلامرضا. (1396). نقد و بررسی آراء قرآن‌گرایان شبه‌قاره در مورد نماز، مطالعات ‌‌شبه‌‌قاره، 9(30).
خضری، محمد. (1373ق). تاریخ التشریع الاسلامی، قاهره: مطبعه الاستقامه.
خطیب‌‌بغدادی، احمدبن‌‌علی. (1395). تقییدالعلم، تحقیق: یوسف ‌‌المرعشلی، بیروت: ‌‌دارالاحیاء السنه النبویه.
رازی، فخرالدین. (بی‌‌تا). التفسیر الکبیر، ط 2، طهران: نشر دارالکتب العلمیه.
راغب اصفهانی، حسین بن محمد. (1373ق). مفردات الفاظ قرآن، مرتضوی، تهران.
سباعی، مصطفی. (1405). السنه و مکانتها، بیروت: المکتب الاسلامی.
سجستانی، ابوداوود سلیمان بن اشعث. (1410ق). السنن، بیروت، دارالفکر.
شاطبی، ابراهیم بن موسی. (1423). الموافقات فی اصول الشریعه، بیروت: دارالکتب العربی.
شافعی، محمدبن ادریس. (1403ق). کتاب الام، بیروت: دارالفکر.
صبحی، منصور احمد. (2006). القرآن ‌‌و کفی مصدر التشریع الاسلامی، بیروت: مؤسسه الانتشار العربی.
طباطبائی، محمّدحسین. (1374). المیزان، ترجمة سید محمدباقر موسوی، قم: جامعة مدرّسین.
طبرسى، فضل بن حسن. (1372). مجمع البیان فی تفسیر القرآن، تهران: انتشارات ناصر خسرو.
طریحی، فخرالدین. (1408ق). مجمع‌البحرین، دفتر نشر و فرهنگ اسلامی، بی‌جا.
عبدالباقی، محمد فؤاد. (۱۳۷۴). معجم المفهرس لألفاظ القرآن الکریم؛ بحاشیة المصحف الشریف. ۱ ج. تهران: اسلامی.
عرشی، محمدحسین. (1975). قرآن سی قرآن تک، لاهور: مطبعه نامی.
مجلۀ البیان. (19۵۱). لاهور: الامرتسریه.
مزروعه، محمود محمد. (2005). شبهات القرآنیین حول السنة النبویة، منتدى التوحید.
مقبول احمد، سید. (1952)، مطالعه الحدیث، اله آبادهند، مکتبه عباس.
نیشابوری، مسلم. (1420ق). صحیح مسلم، بیروت: دار إحیاء التراث العربی.
الهی‌بخش، خادم حسین. (1409). القرآنیّون و شبهاتهم حول السّنّة،الطّائف: مکتبة الصّدّیق.