نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رشتۀ حقوق بین‌الملل دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

2 استادیار رشتۀ حقوق بین‌الملل دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

چندجانبه‌‌گرایی، فرصت جدیدی برای بازیگران سیاسی ازجمله دولت‌‌هاست که در چارچوب قواعد، مقررات و تعهدات بین‌المللی بتوانند منافع خود را در فضای جهانی‌شدن و با بهره‌‌گیری از تعامل با سایر کشورها به‌دست آورند. البته در این میان، خطرات و چالش‌‌هایی نیز پیشِ‌‌روی بازیگران مزبور قرار دارد. یکی از این بازیگران مهم، هند است. در همین راستا، پژوهش حاضر به بررسی چندجانبه‌‌گرایی؛ چالش‌‌ها و فرصت‌‌های پیشِ‌روی سیاست خارجی هند در تعامل با حقوق بین‌الملل می‌‌پردازد. سؤال اساسی پژوهش حاضر این بوده است که چندجانبه‌گرایی در عصر حاضر، چه فرصت‌‌ها و چالش‌‌هایی را پیشِ‌‌روی سیاست خارجی هند قرار داده است؛ بنابراین نوشتار حاضر با استفاده از روش توصیفی-تحلیلی که داده‌‌های آن به‌صورت کتابخانه‌‌ای جمع‌‌آوری شده است، به این نتیجه می‌رسد که (فرضیه) تداوم هژمونی‌گرایی توسط قدرت‌‌های بزرگ به همراه خطر افراطی‌‌گری در شبه‌‌قاره هند به‌عنوان چالش‌‌ها و گسترش منطقه‌‌گرایی در نقاط مختلف جهان به‌عنوان فرصت‌‌های سیاست خارجی هند به‌شمار می‌‌روند که هم‌سویی بالایی با قواعد حقوق بین‌‌‌الملل دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Multilateralism; Indian Foreign Policy’s Challenges and Opportunities Interacting with International Law

نویسندگان [English]

  • AFSHIN JAFARI 1
  • Ali Gholamali 2

1 Assistant Professor of International Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of International Law, Payame Noor University

چکیده [English]

Extensive Abstract:

Introduction

Globalization and the resulting conditions have brought about vast changes in foreign policy of countries all around the world. This has been particularly influential among emerging powers and their foreign policy behavior. It can be said that the communication revolution in the 1980s as well as the collapse of the bipolar system due to the breakup of one-party communist state of Soviet Union along with the expansion of non-governmental organizations and institutions caused emerging countries to pursue various fields in order to achieve their national interests. One of these powers is India, which can play an important role in the international and regional structure due to its special position in both the Indian subcontinent and Asia. Because of its influential political and historical background at global level, India has always been considered as an important actor in regional and international developments and transformations (Mohan, 2006: 2).
Political and economic conditions as well as changes that occur due to globalization have made multilateralism one of the pillars of India''s novel foreign policy. Meanwhile, the role of neighboring powers such as China and Pakistan as well as superpowers such as the United States and Russia is outstanding. In this regard, present study addresses multilateral challenges and opportunities in Indian foreign policy. In addition, this paper focuses on the extent of alignment and non-alignment of Indian foreign policy from the perspective of international law.

Research Method

This article uses a descriptive-analytical approach, relies on data, desk and documentary sources, and reviews the latest studies to examine multilateralism and challenges and opportunities of Indian foreign policy from the perspective of international law.

Discussion

There are important approaches to international relations and every single approach represents a particular perspective on international relations. One of the most important approaches is realism. For realists, regional cooperation is also sought to avoid being eliminated by powerful rivals and hostile actors (Mearshmer, 2010: 161)
According to constructivists, convergence takes place through procedures and intersubjective cognition among actors, and therefore it should be said that these interactions lead to the formation of convergent and cooperative behavior among governments, and they even lead to the establishment of a common identity among governments on a larger scale (Koolaei and Sazmand, 2011: 135).
Proponents of collective security, such as Barry Buzan, also believe that maintaining and enhancing collective security is a multilateral factor in international relations (Buzan, 2000: 10-11).
Type of orientation each country adopts in external environment can affect strategic and macro interests of other countries in the form of opportunities and constraints (Taheri and Bayat, 2018: 191). During the Cold War, India established a kind of leadership among countries of the world called non-alignment (Sharma and Miklian, 2016: 2). Collapse of the Soviet Union and elimination of one of the power blocs in international politics and, consequently, establishment of hegemonic power of USA and Western capitalism over most parts of the world changed India''s socialist policies and new developments began in India''s foreign policy following collapse of the Soviet Union. Entering the 21st century, India, along with China and other countries with high economic growth, has a double power to influence international and regional levels (Malone and Mukherjee, 2010: 150). Therefore, today India tends to the multilateralism policy and plays an important role in the developments and transformations happening in the Indian subcontinent, Asia, Africa and the international system in general due to its geopolitical and geostrategic location in the Indian subcontinent and its access to Indian Ocean, large population, numerous man labor, different cultures and religions, as well as efforts to play a role at international and regional levels.
One of the important signs of India''s foreign policy is the tendency towards superpowers, including the United States and cooperation with NATO (Gholami et al., 2020: 147). The rationale behind these new tendencies is that India encounters many challenges and opportunities due to its strategic geographical location. This country should minimize the threats posed by its neighbors (i.e. Pakistan and China) and at the same time benefit from the support of the United States at regional and international levels (Khokhar, 2018: 18).
On the other hand, cooperation between China and India, that are the most populous countries in the world located in sensitive regions, can be considered as an economic threat to the great European powers and the United States. For this reason, Western powers do not favor the development of China and India (Venkat Raman, 2018: 348).
Although India and China face opportunities, they also encounter threats from the other side under the principle of multilateralism. Chinese support for Pakistan, for example, has become a major source of concern for Indians (Uddin Gojree, 2014: 56). India has great ambitions. Thus, the two countries can create a balanced order at international level by making changes in the structure of the international system and establishing a common approach considering their goals (Venkat Raman, 2018: 352).
If international law is considered as a set of principles accepted by nations and governments at international level, then certain principles and norms prevail this level. The most important principles and norms are adherence of countries to international rules, commitments and norms and countering international threats such as terrorism. Due to its non-alignment policy, India has long been one of the countries recognized international law. Moreover, the names of Indian leaders such as Gandhi and Nehru are recognized as defenders of morality in international politics. India has undertaken extensive activities in line with this approach. India continues to see itself as a major supporter and proponent of shared global values, including human rights and democracy worldwide (Annual Report 2016-2017, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, xvi).

Conclusion

India has vast potential for multilateralism. India''s novel foreign policy is based on interaction with neighboring powers as well as major powers. Thus, given the global conditions resulted from the collapse of the post-Cold War bipolar system, India''s ideological non-aligned foreign policy has been replaced by a pragmatic and multilateral foreign policy that manifests itself in its relations with its neighbors, including China and Pakistan as well as its tendency towards great powers, including the United States and Japan. In any case, it can be said that India has adopted a new approach by reforming and amending the structure of its foreign policy and overcoming its previous ideological and nationalist commitments as well as its non-alignment. India has clearly distancing itself from the old Third World standards that were ruling its domestic and foreign policies. The present study concludes that third world countries should focus on the role India plays at global level when establishing relationship with India. Their relationship with India should also go beyond the ideological goals of the third world. Thus, with its tendency towards regional and global multilateralism, India can be the big voice of developing nations that should pursue a multilateral policy by freeing themselves from unilateral development.
On the other hand, an important part of India''s foreign policy in the region and the world lies in its interaction with international law. So signs of morality and observance of international norms can be seen in Indian foreign policy. Accordingly, India can both increase its power and be a voice for developing countries by tending to global powers such as the United States and Russia, as well as engaging with regional neighbors such as Pakistan.
 
1- Ahmadi Fesharaki, Hossein Ali (1397), Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and India: Areas of Interaction and Confrontation, Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 182-149.
2- Buzan, Bari (2000), Scientific Interview with Bari Buzan, Introduction to the Copenhagen School in the Field of Security Studies, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, Third Year, Third Issue, Fall 2000, Serial Number 9, pp. 11-10.
3- Buzan, Bary. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Translated By Nasri, Ghadir, Juornal of Strategic Studies, No. 24, PP 10-11.
 4- Buzan, Barry, and Weaver, Oliver (2002), Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, translated by Qadir Nasri, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, No. 4, pp. 358-357.
5- Buzan. Bary. (2000). Scientific dialogue With Bari Bozan. Introduction to the Copenhagen School of Security Studies. Journal Strategic Studies. 3 (3), P 358.
6- Bahrami Moghaddam, Sajjad (2014), The Transformation of Indian Foreign Policy: From the Third World to Economic Pragmatism, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, Year 17, Number 4, pp. 197-161.
7- Crisis Group Asia Report (2012), Pakistans relations With India: Beyond Kashmir? Asia Report N 224, May 2012, PP 3-31.
8- Drezner, Daniel W. (2008), “Lost in Translation: The Transatlantic Divide Over Diplomacy”, in Growing Apart?: America and Europe in the Twenty- First Century, Eds. Jeffrey Kopstein and Sven Steinmo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, P 194.
 
9- Gholami, Majid, Vasegh, Mahmoud, Qalibaf, Mohammad Baqer (2020), NATO-India convergence and its effects on the national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Subcontinental Studies, (38) 12, p.147.
10- Hajizadeh, Mahmoud, Nejandi Manesh, Hibatullah, Mohammad Hossein Zarei (2017), The Rule of Law in International Law, Quarterly Journal of Public Law Research, No. 54, pp. 199-171.
11- Horimoto, Takenori (2017), Explaining Indias Forign Policy: From Dream to Realization of Major Power, International Relation of the Asia-Pacific Volume 17, P 30.
12- Hussain, Jassim (2014), Energy Alternatives and the Futere of Oil and Gas in the Gulf, in Gulf cooperation Coucils; challenges and Prospects, Allazeera Center for Studies, P 119.
13- Khakhar, Riaz (2018), The US-India Strategic Partnership: Pakistans Foreign Policy Reponce, CISS Insight Vol. No. 1. PP 4,5,18.
14- Kolaei, Elahe, Azami, Tayebeh (2012), Foreign Policy Development and Economic Development in India, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Fourth Year, No. 1, pp. 274-247.
15- Kolaei, Elaheh, Sazmand, Bahareh (2011), Intra-theoretical and extra-theoretical contexts of change in regionalism theories, two scientific-research quarterly journals of theoretical policy, new volume, ninth issue, p. 135.
 
16- Mearsheimer, J. (2010) Structural realism, in Dunne, Tim; Kurki, Milja; Smith, P 161.
 
17- Mohan, Raja (2006), Indias New Foreign Policy Strategy, The Indian Express, New Dehli, P 8. 
18- Parpiani, Kashish (2018), India- Us Relations Under Trump: Guarding against Transacationalism by pivoting to US Legislature, ORF ISSUE BRIF, OCTOBER 2018, NO. 262, PP 1-15. 
19- Raman Gundumella, Venkat (2018), India in China s Foreign Policy, China: International Journal. 9, 2 (Sept. 2012), PP 342-352.
20- Roshan, Amir, Faraji, Mohammad Reza, Ranjbar Heidari, Vahid (2016), Multilateralism of China''s Strategy in Central Asia, Strategy Quarterly, 25 (79), p.49.
 
21- Ruggie, John. (1992), Multilateralism: An Anatomy of an Institution, International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, PP 567-568.
 
22- Safdari, Mohammad (2003), Public International Law, Tehran: Abu Reihan Publications, p.15.
23- Schechter, M. (1999), Innovation in Multilateralism (Basingstoke: Palgrave  Macmillan), P 26.
 
24- Sharma and Miklian, Devika and Jason (2016), Indias Global foreign policy engagements a New paradigm?, Noref, nawegian Peacebulding Resource Center, P 2.
25- Taheri, Ebrahim, Bayat, Mohsen (2018), India''s Foreign Relations: Opportunities and Limitations Facing the Islamic Republic of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Subcontinental Studies, (34) 10, p.191.
26- Uddin Gojree, Mehraj (2014), Forign Policy of India towards China: Principles and Perspectives, International Research Journal of Sciences, Vol. 3 (9), PP 50-58.
27- Wiseman, Geor. (2011), Norms and Diplomacy: The Diplomatic Underpinnings of Multilateralism, The New Dynamics of Multilateralism, Westview Press, P 17.
 
Reports:
28- Annual Report 2008-2009, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi, PP 6-96.
29- Annual Report 2016-2017, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi, PP xvi,66,96.
 

  1. احمدی فشارکی، حسینعلی، سیاست خارجی جمهوری اسلامی ایران و هند: حوزه‌های تعامل و تقابل، فصلنامۀ مطالعات جهان، دورۀ 1، شمارۀ 2، صص 149-182، دانشکدۀ مطالعات جهان، زمستان 1390.
  2. بوزان، باری؛ ویور، الیور، مناطق و قدرت‌‌ها: ساختار امنیت بین‌‌المللی، ترجمۀ قدیر نصری، فصلنامۀ مطالعات راهبردی، شمارۀ 4، صص 358-357، پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات راهبردی: تابستان 1383.
  3. بهرامی‌‌مقدّم، سجاد، دگرگونی سیاست خارجی هند: از جهان سوم گرایی به سوی عمل‌‌گرایی اقتصادی، فصلنامۀ مطالعات راهبردی، سال 17، شمارۀ 4، صص 161-196، پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات راهبردی: پاییز 1393.
  4. حاجی‌‌زاده، محمود؛ نژندی‌‌منش، هیبت‌‌الله؛ زارعی، محمدحسین، جایگاه حاکمیت قانون در حقوق بین‌الملل، فصلنامۀ پژوهش حقوق عمومی، دورۀ 18 شمارۀ 54، صص 199-171، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی: بهار 1396.
  5. روشن، امیر؛ فرجی، محمدرضا؛ رنجبر حیدری، وحید، چندجانبه‌گرایی راهبرد چین در آسیای مرکزی، فصلنامۀ راهبرد، دورۀ 25، شمارۀ 79، صص 67-49، پژوهشکدۀ تحقیقات راهبردی: تابستان 1395.
  6. صفدری، محمد، حقوق بین‌‌الملل عمومی، تهران: انتشارات ابوریحان، 1382.
  7. طاهری، ابراهیم؛ بیات، محسن؛ روابط خارجی هند: فرصت‌ها و محدودیت‌های پیشِ‌روی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، فصلنامۀ مطالعات شبه‌قاره، دورۀ 10، شمارۀ 34، صص 191-210، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان: بهار و تابستان 1397.
  8. غلامی، مجید؛ واثق، محمود؛ قالیباف، محمدباقر، همگرایی ناتو و هند و اثرات آن بر امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، فصلنامۀ مطالعات شبه‌قاره، دورۀ 12، شمارۀ 38، صص 162-147، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان: بهار و تابستان 1399.
  9. کولایی، الهه؛ اعظمی، طیبه، تحول سیاست خارجی و توسعه اقتصادی در هندوستان، فصلنامۀ روابط خارجی، سال 4، شمارۀ 1، صص 247-274، پژوهشکدۀ تحقیقات راهبردی، مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام: بهار 1391.
  10. کولایی، الهه؛ سازمند، بهاره، زمینه‌‌های درون نظری و برون نظری تحول در نظریه‌‌های منطقه‌‌گرایی، دوفصلنامۀ سیاست نظری، دورۀ جدید، شمارۀ 9، صص 151-135، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی جهاد دانشگاهی: بهار 1390.
  11. Annual Report 2008-2009, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi, PP 6-96.
  12. Annual Report 2016-2017, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi, PP xvi, 66, 96.
  13. Crisis Group Asia Report, Pakistans relations With India: Beyond Kashmir? Asia Report N 224, May 2012, PP 3-31.
  14. Drezner, Daniel W., “Lost in Translation: The Transatlantic Divide Over Diplomacy”, in Growing Apart? America and Europe in the Twenty- First Century, Eds. Jeffrey Kopstein and Sven Steinmo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, PP 180-194.
  15. Horimoto, Takenori, Explaining Indias Forign Policy: From Dream to Realization of Major Power, International Relation of the Asia-Pacific Volume 17, 2017, PP 27-42.
  16. Hussain, Jassim, Energy Alternatives and the Futere of Oil and Gas in the Gulf, in Gulf cooperation Coucils; challenges and Prospects, Allazeera Center for Studies, 2014, PP 109-129.
  17. Khokhar, Riaz, The US-India Strategic Partnership: Pakistans Foreign Policy Reponce, CISS Insight Vol. No. 1, 2018, PP 4,5,18.
  18. Malone, David M. & Mukherjee, Rohan, India and China: Conflict and Cooperation, Survival, 2010, 52:1, PP 137-158.
  19. Mearsheimer, J., Structural realism, in Dunne, Tim; Kurki, Milja; Smith, 2010, PP 145-161.
  20. Mohan, Raja, Indias New Foreign Policy Strategy, The Indian Express, New Dehli, 2006, PP 2-18.
  21. Parpiani, Kashish, India- Us Relations Under Trump: Guarding against Transacationalism by pivoting to US Legislature, ORF ISSUE BRIF, OCTOBER 2018, NO. 262, PP 1-15.
  22. Raman Gundumella, Venkat, India in China s Foreign Policy, China: International Journal. 9, 2 (Sept. 2012), 2018, PP 342-352.
  23. Ruggie, John, Multilateralism: An Anatomy of an Institution, International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, 1992, PP 567-568.
  24. Schechter, M., Innovation in Multilateralism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 1999, PP 12-26.
  25. Sharma and Miklian, Devika and Jason, Indias Global foreign policy engagements a new paradigm? Noref, nawegian Peacebulding Resource Center, 2016, PP 2-17.
  26. Uddin Gojree, Mehraj, Forign Policy of India towards China: Principles and Perspectives, International Research Journal of Sciences, Vol. 3 (9), 2014, PP 50-58.
  27. Wiseman, Geor., Norms and Diplomacy: The Diplomatic Underpinnings of Multilateralism, The New Dynamics of Multilateralism, Westview Press, 2014, PP 5-27.