جریان های نوگرا در شبه قاره هند وآراء آن ها پیرامون قرآن «جنبشی علمی یا نهضتی سیاسی»

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

10.22111/jsr.2012.836

چکیده

شبه قاره هند سرزمینی است که با پشت سر گذاردن فرازها و فرودهای بسیار - بویژه پس از استعمار انگلیس- زمینه ساز پیدایش جنبش های گوناگون مذهبی و سیاسی بود. این نهضت ها (اسلامی) گرچه با اهداف نوگرایانه و به قصد اصلاح و مبارزه با تفکرات وارداتی استعمار پایه ریزی شد، اما به لحاظ نظری برداشتهای خاصی- به ویژه پیرامون قرآن- به همراه داشت، به طوری که در آغاز قرن بیستم برون داد آن تشکیل جماعتی بنیادگرا به نام «اهل قرآن» بود که فقط قرآن را منبع شریعت می دانست.
مقاله حاضر به روش توصیفی – تحلیلی با استفاده از منابع تاریخی، حدیثی و قرآنی ضمن اندیشه یابی و جریان شناسی این تفکر، بیان می دارد که: اندیشه قرآن بسندگی در اصل ادامه و جلوه افراطی تر تفکر نص گرا در جریان «اهل حدیث» می باشد.
این جریان نوپدید دو مؤلفه بنیادین دارد- نادیده انگاشتن حجیت حدیث، و اکتفا کردن به قرآن- که هر کدام آسیب های بسیاری دارد که نوشته حاضر فقط به مؤلفه دوم و نقد آن       می پردازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Reformist Movements in the Indian Subcontinent and Their Views on the Quran ( Scientific Movement versus Political Movement)

چکیده [English]

The Indian subcontinent , witnessing many historical ups and downs, especially after the British colonialism, created the ground for the formation of various religious and political movements.  New Islamic thoughts came to existence in India with the modernism doctrine, intended to correct and challenge the imported thoughts remaining from the colonialism era.  The new schools of thought came with special interpretation of the Islamic religious beliefs, in particular concerning the Quran.  One of these movements was Quranism whose followers believed the Quran was the only source of Sharia. It was formed upon two main objectives: ignoring the value of hadith, and resorting to the Quran as the only source for religious interpretation.  Quranism movement created the ground for the formation of a fundamentalist group called Ahl al-Quran, both bearing many shortcomings. The focus of the present study is on the Quranism school of thinking.
This article used the descriptive-analytical method to search through history and hadith resources as well as the Quran itself to find the underlying reasons for the formation of the Quranism school of thinking, concluding that Quranism was an extreme form of Ahl al-Hadith school of thinking.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • subcontinent
  • fundamentalist
  • Quranism
  • Quran-sufficiency

مراجع

1- The Holy Quran
2- Abd al Ghani, A. Kh. Tradition Argument.Beirut: Dar al-Sadavi.
3- Aghaiee,S.A. (2010) Quran-sufficiency and Rejection of Hadith Argument. Ma’refat Kalami Journal, V. 1, No. 3,P:95
4- Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. (1402AH)Mosnad. Beirut: Dar Sader
5- Ahmad Khan, S.S.Interpretation of Al-Quran va Hov al-Hoda vaal-Forghan,(Fakhr Gilani,S.M.T.,Trans.), Tehran: Elmi & Partners.    
6- Aisha Y.M., (2008) Hadith as scripture, Discussions on the Authority of Prophet. New York.
7- Alavi Mehr, H. (2002) Interpretive Approaches and Orientations. Qom: Osveh.
8- Al-Behi, M. (2005) Islamic Thinking about Hadith and the Influence of Colonialism. Cairo: Maktab al-Vahbeh.
9- Al-Dhahabi,M.(1369AH) Interpretation and Interpreters. Beirut: Dar al-Kotob al-Haditheh.
10- Ibid.(1419 AH)Tazkirat-al-Hoffaz.Beirut:Dar al-Kotob al-Elmieh.
11- Al-Ghasemi,M.J.Mahasen-al-Ta’vil.Researched by Abd al-Baghi, M. Beirut: Dar al-Fekr.
12- Al- Heythami, I. H. (1385 AH) Al-Savaegh al-Moharragheh.  Cairo: Maktab al-Ghahereh.
13- Al-Samhoodi, N. A.  Javaher al-Aghdin Fi Fazl al-Sharafein Sharaf al-Elm: Al-Halabi va Al-Nasab Al-Nabavi.  Researched by Ata, M. A. Beirut: Dar al-Kotob al-Elmieh.   
14- Al-Shafei, M. (1407 AH) Al-Om.  Beirut: Dar al-Ma’refah.
15- Ibid.(1940) Al-Resaleh.Edited and Printed by Shaker, A. M., Cairo.
16- Amin, M. (1406AH) A'yan al-Shiite. Beirut: Dar al-Taarof Lelmatboo'at.
17- Asa’di, et al. (2010).  Risk analysis of Interpretative Movements. Qom: Hozeh and DaneshgahResearchCenter.
18- Ayazi, S. M. A. (1999). Introduction to Interpretations. Tehran: Ketab Mobin.
19- A'zami, M. M. (1413 AH)  Lessons from the Prophet's Hadiths. Beirut: Islamic School.
20- Aziz Ahmad. (1964) Islamic Modernism in India and Pakistan. Oxford.
21-Ibid. (1988)  History of Islamic Thinking in India. (Lotfi, N., Yahaghi, M. J., Trans.), Tehran: Elmi& Farhangi Press.
22- Babaee, A. A. (2006) Quran Interpretation Methodology.  Tehran: Samt.
23- Baghdadi, A. (1401 AH) A Book of Islam Principles. Beirut: Offset.
24- Behnesavi, S. (1413 AH) Al Sunah Al Moftari Alayha. Cairo: Dar al-vafa.
25- Brown, D. (1996) Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought. Cambridge.
26- Cook, M. (1997) The Opponents of the Writing of Tradition in Early Islam. Arabica.
27- Eiji, A.(1991) Al-Mavaghef. Qom: Manshoorat Al-Sharif Al-Razi.
28- Elahibakhsh, Kh. H. (1421 AH) Al-Quraniyoon and Their Doubts about Tradition. Taef: Maktab al-seddigh.
29- Enayat, H. (1984)  Arab Political Thinking: A Review.  Tehran: jibi Books.
30- Hakem Neyshabouri.  (1411AH) Al-Mostadrak ala al-Sehhihin. Researched by Al-Mara’shi, Y. Beirut: Dar al-Fekr.
31- Ibn Taymiyyah, T. A. (1392 AH)  Introduction to Interpretation Principles. Beirut: Al-Resaleh Institute.
32- Ja’farian, R. (1992) The Fight between Tradition and Modernism. Qom: Raoof.
33- Javadi Amoli, A. (2005)  Tasnim Interpretation.  5th Ed. Qom: AsraPublishingCenter.
34-Jorjani, A. G. (1419 AH)  Sharh al-Mavaghef. Beirut: Dar al-Kotob al-Elmieh.
35- Juynboll, G. H. A. (1974) The Authenticity of the Tradition Literature: Discussions in Modern Egypt. Leiden.
36- Khajeh Ahmad Ad-Din.(1930)Bayan Lel-Nas Interpretation. Amritsar.
37- Khezri, M. (2011) History of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cairo, Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islami.
38- Khorramshahi, B. (1985) Interpretation and Modern Interpretations. Tehran: Keyhan. 
39- Ibid. (1998) Quran Theses and Quran Research. Tehran: Doostan.
40- Lahijee, A. (1998). Gohar Morad. Tehran: Islamieh Bookstore.
41- Majlesi, M. B. (1413 AH)  Bahar al-Anvar. Beirut: Dar al-Zava.
42- Moaddab, S. R. (2001)  Quran Interpretation Methods.  Qom: QomUniversity, Eshragh Publishing.
43- Ibid. (2009) Quran Interpretation Principles. Qom: QomUniversity Publishing.
44- Molti, A. M. (1418 AH) Ketab al-Tanbih va al-Rad ala Ahl al-Hava va al-Bad'e. Cairo.
45-Moshir, H. (1988) Islamic Movement and Group Orientations in Indian Colony. (Lahooti, H., Trans). Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation.
46-Moslem Neyshabouri.(1398AH) Sahih Moslem. Beirut: Dar al-Fekr.   
47- Motahhari, M.(1372AH) The Collection of Writings. Qom: Sadra.
48- Murray, T. (1959) Islam in India and Pakistan. Calcutta.
49- Najafi, M. (1995) Political Issues in History of Islamic Thinking.  Tehran: Humanistic Sciences and Cultural StudiesResearchCenter.
50- Nashi, A. M. (1971)  Ketab Osool al-Nahl. Beirut.
51- Sabaee. M., (1405 AH) Tradition and Its Position in Islamic Jurisprudence. Beirut: Dar al- Varagh.
52- Sabooni, M. A. (1417 AH) Pure Prophet's Tradition. Mecca: Islamic World Relation Publishing.
53- Sedghi. (1906) Al-Islam Hov al-Quran Vahda. Al-Menar Magazine, N. 9.
54- Shahroor, M. (1997) AL-Ketab va al-Quran. Damascus: Al-Ahali Lel-Tab'ae va al-Nashr.
55- Sharif Morteza, A. (1422 AH)  Tanzih al-Anbia va al-Aemmeh. Researched by Fars Hasoon, K., Qom: Boostan Ketab.
56- Sobhani, J.(1987)ManshoorJavid.Qom: Islamic Publishing Office.
57- Tabatabaee, M. h. (1392 AH) Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Quran. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-Islamieh.
مطالعات شبه قاره
دوره 4، شماره 11 - شماره پیاپی 11
سال چهارم، شماره یازدهم، تابستان 1391
مرداد 1391
صفحه 43-60

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار