بررسی و تحلیل نقش اشیای متبرک در سیاست‌های فرهنگی دکن عصر قطب‌شاهیان(1098-918ه‌ق)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیارگروه تاریخ، دانشگاه سیدجمال‌الدین اسدآبادی، همدان، ایران.(نویسنده مسئول)

2 دانش‌آموخته‌دکتری تاریخ ایران دوره اسلامی‌ دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه تاریخ ، دانشگاه سیدجمال‌الدین اسدآبادی همدان، ایران.

10.22111/jsr.2025.46908.2382

چکیده

قطب‌شاهیان یا سلطنت گلکنده،اعقاب قراقویونلوهای ایران بودند که سلسله‌ای شیعی حیدرآباد)دکن( در جنوب هندوستان تأسیس کردند که از سال‌918 تا 1098‌ه‌ق تداوم یافت.قطب‌شاهیان در جهت گسترش مذهب تشیع دردکن،نوعی سیاست فرهنگی با استفاده ازنمادهای مقدس شیعی اتخاذ کردند. تحقیق حاضر می‌کوشد با الهام از نظریه سیاست فرهنگی و روش توصیفی-تحلیلی به این پرسش اساسی پاسخ دهد که: به هم‌پیوستگی اشیای متبرک و سیاست‌های فرهنگی درجهت گسترش مذهب تشیع در دکن و حیدرآباد چگونه قابل تبیین است؟
نتایج تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که نمادهای مقدس شیعی حضوری همیشگی در اعمال عبادی شیعیان دِکَن در دوره قطب‌شاهیان داشته است. قطب‌شاهیان با اتکا به سیاست فرهنگی متناسب و نمایشی و همچنین گفتمان هویت-بخش فرهنگی، اشیای متبرک و مقدس ائمه و اهل‌بیت را در عَلَم‌ها ترکیب کردند و آنها را در جهت تقویت هویت‌های اجتماعی و فرهنگی مختص شیعی و درجهت محافظت و ضرورت هویت جامعه شیعی در دکن و حیدرآباد به کار بردند و با نمادسازی آیینی از این اشیاء مقدس، در سطحی کلان، مفاهیم اساسی هویتی فرهنگ شیعه را به منصه ظهور رساندند، سوگیری‌های جانبی آنرا شکل دادند،مرزهای فرهنگی راهویتبخشیدند و از درون آن، رفتار، فعالیت‌ها، جریان‌ها و سیاست‌های فرهنگی ویژه‌ای مطابق و سازگار با گفتمان مرکزی(تشیع) و گفتمان محوری آن(عاشورا) ارائه کردند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation and analysis of the role of blessed objects in the cultural policies of the Deccan during the Qutb Shahian era (918-1098 AH)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Moslem Soleimanian 1
  • Nader Parvin 2
  • Zoleka Amini 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of History, Seyyed Jamal-eddin Asadabadi University, Hamedan, Iran. (Corresponding author)
2 PhD in Iranian History of the Islamic Period, Razi University of Kermanshah, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of History, Seyyed Jamal-eddin Asadabadi University, Hamadan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The Qutb-Shahis or Golkandah Dynasty were the descendants of the Qaraqoyunlu of Iran, who established a Shiite dynasty in Hyderabad in the Deccan region of southern India, which lasted from 918 to 1098 AH. In order to spread the Shia religion in the Deccan, the Qutb-Shahis adopted a kind of cultural policy using sacred Shia symbols. The current research tries to answer this basic question, inspired by the theory of cultural politics and the descriptive-analytical method: How can the connection between blessed objects and cultural policies in the direction of the expansion of Shia religion in Deccan and Hyderabad be explained?
The results of the research show that sacred Shiite symbols had a constant presence in the devotional practices of Deccan Shiites during the Qutb Shahian period. Relying on appropriate and dramatic cultural policy as well as the discourse of cultural identity, the Qutbshahs combined the blessed and holy objects of the Imams and Ahl al-Bayt in the Alams and used them in order to strengthen the social and cultural identities specific to Shia and the degree of protection and necessity. They used the identity of the Shia community in Deccan and Hyderabad and by symbolizing these holy objects, they

Introduction

Cultural policy can be considered a wide range of activities that governments carry out in the field of culture. A set of activities that governments understand the need to support and in this regard, they provide a picture of the components of culture and civilization and also support and support various cultural institutions, classes and objects. This is the product of political choices among a wide range of potential forms and different levels of support that rulers provide. In this analytical form, cultural policy is only a tool that rulers allocate as a set of specific actions, organizations and choices. (Gray.2010:214-215) The importance of adopting cultural policy is mainly in order to gain the legitimacy of rulers and institutionalize the discourse of cultural policy among the masses of societies. This is more evident when rulers with a minority religion rule over large masses of different religions; In some cases, they may have biological roots elsewhere. One of the governments that fits the above definitions is the Qutb Shahis (1098-918 AH). The rulers of this dynasty, considering the diversity of their subjects under their rule and the existence of religious and political opponents and rivals in India, including the Babur government and other local Indian governments, needed to adopt a cultural policy in the spread of their favorite religion, Shiism. Therefore, to promote Shiism in their ruling region, the Deccan and Hyderabad, they used Shiite symbols well to strengthen Shiism among both their supporters and opponents. These symbols included: sacred objects and relics, tombs and their accessories (zarih, coffin and ta'ziyya), war flags (alam), burial utensils (nakhl), holy steps and handprints, wall hangings, votive objects, amulets and Ashurakhaneh.
The present study is based on the assumption that the cultural policy of the Qutb Shahs in India played a decisive role in consolidating Shia political life. In fact, rulers, by adopting cultural policies, follow social changes and political conditions over time, and on the other hand, symbols, interests and views of the people also need to change over time. Since symbols and their impact on the attitudes, feelings and perceptions governing political behavior in any society are not a mass of purely coincidental matters, but rather represent patterns of compatibility that are proportionate and mutually reinforce each other; on this basis, it has been observed that there is a relationship between the degree of interconnectedness of sacred objects and cultural policies in the Deccan during the Qutb Shahs, which shows itself as a representation of religious identity; In such a way that the greater the representation of religious identity by the symbols and sacred objects produced, the greater the radius of influence and legitimacy of the governments, the preservation and survival of the political system, the stability and increase of their power for important decision-making in the country. On this basis, the cultural policy of the Qutb Shahi sultans in supporting the Shiite religion was based on the optimal use of sacred Shiite symbols and the development of Shiite worship, literature, memorial and visual rituals in the Deccan and Hyderabad, so that by relying on this policy, the main approach of this dynasty can be called cultural.
1.1. Research methodology
The authors of this study aim to study and examine the role of sacred objects in the cultural policies of the Deccan during the Qutb Shahi era (1098-918 AH). First, they discuss the impact of the role of sacred objects in the conditions of the time. Then, by evaluating the reports of the events and incidents described, they examine the style and characteristics of historiography and its place in the cultural policies of the Deccan during the Qutb Shahi era and draw conclusions from it. Given the nature of the research, the research method is descriptive-analytical. This study attempts to understand the main aspects of the political, religious and social life of this period through the study and examination of the role of sacred objects in the cultural policies of the Deccan during the Qutb Shahi era (1098-918 AH) through a conceptual and methodological understanding of its reports.
 

Discussion

The first use of Shiite sacred symbols and environmental objects dates back to the lives of the prophets and the pure Imams, who used them to try to culturalize and socialize the masses of the people. The pure Imams used sacred objects, including swords, robes, books, etc., to express their political power and authority (Sheikh Mufid, 2/27, 1392). According to the Shiite text, the ownership of these objects was rightfully attributed to the Imam, who considered it an asset that increased his authority, which was a symbol of divine favor and mercy on his rule. Displaying a sacred object in the public domain, especially items belonging to the Prophet, such as his robe and sword, as well as the place of prayer and the Prophet's (PBUH) footsteps, was a symbolic display of the earthly power of the Imams as the sacred trust of God, allowing them to identify themselves as descendants of the true Imams or Prophets and to confirm the legitimacy of their rule (Shaykh Mufid, Beta, 2/157). Most sacred objects in Shia Islam are physical and include items and pieces of clothing, horseshoes, swords, armor, chains and shackles, and books. These items are described as sacred by implication because they were worn or owned by specific individuals from the Ahl al-Bayt. This is also true of the cultural policy of the Qutb Shahis, who used non-physical sacred objects in the Deccan and Hyderabad to create discourse, identity, structure, and implement a proportionate and representative cultural policy among Sunni and Hindu communities. The main idea of ​​the dramatic cultural policy is based on two bases and axes: the magnification of religious and national figures with the general aim of beautifying the dominant social order. Therefore, in this research, the guide to analyzing the cultural policy of the Qutb Shahs in using sacred Shiite symbols and various ceremonies derived from the Shiite religion, including the Ta'ziyya on the day of Ashura, is based on the discourse of appropriate and dramatic cultural policy.
 

Conclusion

 Symbols are considered to be among the most important symbols of governments, and any slogan or symbol found on them reflects the cultural policies and tendencies of their owners. Shiite governments are no exception to this. From this perspective, the Qutb Shahi Shiite sultans, who are descendants of the Qaraquyunlu dynasty of Iran, have a special place in adopting cultural policies based on the use of Shiite sacred objects. The findings of the study show that Shiite sacred objects have had a constant presence in their cultural policies. In fact, the Qutb Shahs pursued a proportionate and theatrical cultural policy and identity discourse, namely the holding of various Shiite ceremonies, including Ashura and Muharram, as the central discourse of the Shiite religion, through the display of Shiite sacred objects and motifs, including sacred objects and relics, tombs and their accessories (shrines, coffins, and ta'ziyya), war flags (flags), burial objects (palms), holy steps and handprints, wall hangings, votive objects, amulets, and Ashurakhaneh. They emphasized public support for the arts, media regulation, and the negotiated construction of a cultural identity related to the Shiite nation-state and culture. In implementing a dramatic cultural policy, they resorted to ritual symbolization and exaggeration of Shiite manifestations with the overall aim of embellishing the social order of the inhabitants of the Deccan and Hyderabad, and in this process, they were able to bring to the fore, in the first stage and at a macro level, the basic concepts of identity of a Shiite culture. In the second stage, they shaped its lateral concepts and biases, in the third stage, they gave identity to cultural boundaries, and in the fourth stage, from within it, they presented specific cultural behavior, activities, trends, and policies consistent with and compatible with the main concepts of Shiite discourse
 

References

Holy Quran.
Abū Mukhnaf, Lūt ibn Yahyā (1398 AH), Maqtal al-Husayn, translated by Mahdi Bagheri Esfandani and others, Tehran, Ilm va Adab.
Ishtaryan, Kiumars (1391 AH), An Introduction to Cultural Policy Methodology, Tehran, Sociologists.
Akbar, Razieh (n.d.), Persian Prose and Poetry during the Qutb Shahi Period, Hyderabad Deccan, no publisher.
Baladhuri, Ahmad ibn Yahyā (1417 AH), Ansab al-Ashraf, Vol. 4, Tehran, Ilmi Farhangi.
Taqi al-Din Muhammad ibn Sadr al-Din, Ali (n.d.), Mizan al-Tabai al-Qutb Shahi, Manuscript No. 9365/1, Central Library of the University of Tehran.
Hosseini, Khorshah ibn Qabad (1379 AH), History of the Ilchi Nizam Shah, edited and annotated by Mohammad Reza Nasiri, Koyichihaneh Da, Tehran, Cultural Heritage and Historical Monuments Association.
Khalidi, Omar (1383 AH), “A Look at the Culture of Shia Muslims in the Deccan,” Report of Dialogue, translated by Mohammad Mahdi Tavassoli, No. 13.
Khanzaman Khan, Gholam Hossein Khan (1377 AH), History of the Asaf Jahs (Golzar Asafiya), edited by Mohammad Mahdi Tavassoli, Islamabad, Persian Research Center of Iran and Pakistan.
Khezri, Ahmad Reza (1391 AH), Shia in History, Qom, Maaref Publishing.
Rayband Rayan, son of Ray Baharmal (n.d.), Lab al-Tawarih Hind or Lab al-Bab Hind, Manuscript No. 5347, Central Library of the University of Tehran.
Saadi Shirazi, Mirza Nizam al-Din (1961), Hadiqat al-Salatin, edited and annotated by Sayyid Ali Asghar Belgrami, Hyderabad Deccan, printed by Sayyid Ali Asghar Belgrami.
Somer, Faruq (1369 AH), Qara Qoyunlu, translated by Wahab Vali, Tehran, Cultural Research Institute.
Somer, Faruq (1371 AH), The Role of Anatolian Turks in the Formation and Development of the Safavid State, translated by Ehsan Eshraqi and Mohammad Taqi Imami, Tehran, Gostareh Publishing.
Sheikh Hurr al-Amili (1409 AH), Wasail al-Shi’a, Vol. 2, Qom, Ahl al-Bayt Institute (AS).
Sheikh Saduq (1413 AH), Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih, Vol. 1, Qom, Islamic Publications.
Sheikh Mufid, Muhammad ibn Muhammad (1392 AH), Irshad, translated by Sayyid Hussein Mousavi Mojab, Tehran, Sarvar.
Shirazi, Rafi’ al-Din, Ibrahim (n.d.), Tazkirah al-Muluk, Manuscript available in the National Library of Paris, No. 619.
Shirazi, Ibn Abd Allah (n.d.), History of Sultan Muhammad Qutb Shah, Manuscript No. 3885, Malek National Library, Article One.
Sharwani, Harun Khan (1947), History of the Qutb Shahi Dynasty, Delhi, no publisher.
Sadeqi Alavi, Mahmoud (1385 AH), “Qutb Shahis (Political and Cultural-Religious History),” Master’s thesis in Islamic History, Tehran, University of Tehran.
Abdul Hayy (1947), Nuzhat al-Khawatir, Vol. 1, India, Hyderabad, no publisher.
Tabatabai, Sayyid Ali Azizullah (1355 AH), Burhan Ma’athir, Delhi, Delhi Society.
Qadiri Zuri, Muhy al-Din (1957), Life of Mir Mumin, Hyderabad, Urdu Literature Administration.
Qurtubi, Arib ibn Sa’d (1369 AH), Sila of History al-Tabari, Vol. 1, translated by Abul Qasim Payandeh, Tehran, Asatir.
Mohammad Ali Khan (1942), Tazkirah of Dhakirin, Hyderabad, Mashir Alam Press.
McGuigan (1388 AH), Rethinking Cultural Policy, translated by Nematollah Fazeli and Morteza Gholich, Tehran, Imam Sadiq University (AS).
Masoumi, Mohsen (1389 AH), Iranian Islamic Culture and Civilization in the Deccan during the Bahmanid Period, Tehran, Contemporary Thought.
Monshi Qadir Khan (1306 AH), History of the Qutb Shahis, edited by Sayyid Burhan al-Din Ahmad, Hyderabad Deccan, lithographed.
Mir Abul Qasim, Razi al-Din ibn Nur al-Din addressed to Mir Alam (1309 AH), Hadiqat al-Alam, edited by Sayyid Abdul Latif Shirazi, Hyderabad Deccan, printed by Sayyid Abdul Latif Shirazi.
Nahavandi, Abdul Baqir (1925), Ma’athir Rahimi, edited by Mohammad Hedayat Hossein, Kolkata, no publisher.
Kulayni, Muhammad ibn Ya’qub (1407 AH), Al-Kafi, Vol. 6, Tehran, Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyya.
Hashem Khan, Muhammad (1925), Muntakhab al-Bab, edited by Sarwazli Hig, Kolkata, edited by the Bengal Asiatic Society.
Hindushah, Muhammad ibn Qasim and Golshan Ibrahimi (1301 AH), History of Farishta, Vol. 1 and 2, lithographed.
Waltison, B. (1396 AH), “The Playfulness of Power: The Impact of Producer-Consumer Media Culture,” in Power and Cultural Policy in International Relations, edited by Sang, G. Chi, translated by Asghar Ghahramanpour, Tehran, Ilmi Farhangi.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sacred objects and symbols
  • cultural politics
  • Shiism
  • Qutb Shahian
  • Deccan
قرآن کریم.
ابومخنف، لوط­بن­یحیی. (1398). مقتل­الحسین، مترجمان، مهدی باقری اسفندانی و دیگران،  تهران: علم و ادب.
اشتریان،کیومرث. (1391). مقدمه­ای بر روش سیاست­گذاری فرهنگی، تهران: جامعه­شناسان.
اکبر، رضیه. (بی­تا). نظم ونثر فارسی در زمان قطب­شاهی، حیدرآباد دکن: بی‏نا.
بلاذری، احمد­بن­یحیی. (1417). انساب­الاشراف، ج4، تهران: علمی فرهنگی.
تقی­الدین محمد ابن صدرالدین، علی. ( بی­تا ). میزان­الطبایع قطب­شاهی، نسخة خطی شمارة 9365/1، کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه تهران.
حسینی، خورشاه ابن قباد. (1379). تاریخ ایلچی نظامشاه، تصحیح و تحشیه و اضافات محمدرضا نصیری، کوییچی‏هانه دا، تهران: انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی.
خالدی، عمر. (1383). «نگاهی به فرهنگ شیعیان دکن»، نشریة گزارش گفتگو، ترجمة محمد مهدی توسلی، ش13.
خانزمان­خان، غلامحسین­خان. (1377). تاریخ آصف­جاهیان(گلزار آصفیه)، به اهتمام محمدمهدی توسلی، اسلام­آباد، مرکز تحقیقات فارسی ایران و پاکستان.
خضری، احمدرضا. (1391). تشیع در تاریخ، قم، نشر معارف.
رای بند راین پسر رای بهارمال. (بی­تا). لب­التواریخ هند یا لب­الباب هند، نسخه­خطی شمارة 5347 ، کتابخانة مرکزی دانشگاه تهران.
صاعدی­شیرازی، میرزا نظام­الدین. (1961). حدیقه­السلاطین، تصحیح و تحشیه سی علی­اصغر بلگرامی، حیدرآباد دکن، چاپ سید علی­اصغر بلگرامی.
سومر، فاروق. (1369). قراقویونلوها، ترجمه: وهاب ولى، تهران: مؤسسة تحقیقات­فرهنگى.
سومر، فاروق. (1371). نقش ترکان آناتولى در تشکیل و توسعة دولت صفوى، ترجمة احسان اشراقى و محمدتقى امامى، تهران: نشر گستره.
شیخ حرعاملی. (1409 ه­ق ). وسائل­الشیعه، ج2، قم، مؤسسه آل­البیت(ع).
شیخ­صدوق. (1413 ه­ق). من لایحضره الفقیه،ج1، قم، انتشارات اسلامی.
شیخ­مفید، محمدبن­محمد. (1392). ارشاد، ترجمة سیدحسین موسوی مجاب، تهران: سرور.
شیرازی رفیع­الدین، ابراهیم. (بی­تا). تذکره­الملوک، نسخه خطی موجود در کتابخانة ملی پاریس، شمارة619.
شیرازی، ابن­عبداللله. (بی­تا). تاریخ­سلطان محمد قطب­شاه، نسخه­خطی شمارة 3885، کتابخانه ملی ملک، مقاله اول.
شروانی، هارون­خان. (1947). تاریخ سلسله قطب­شاهی، دهلی: بی­نا.
صادقی­علوی، محمود. (1385). «قطب­شاهیان (تاریخ سیاسی و فرهنگی ـ مذهبی)»، پایان­نامة مقطع کارشناسی­ارشد رشتة تاریخ اسلام، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
عبدالحی. (1947). نزهه­الخواطر، ج1، هند، حیدرآباد: بی­نا.
طباطبا، سیدعلی عزیزاللّه. ‏(1355ق). برهان مآثر، دهلی: جامعه دهلی.
قادری زوری، محی‌الدین. (1957). حیات میرمؤمن، حیدرآباد: ادارۀ ادبیات اردو.
قرطبی، عریب­بن­سعد. (1369). صله تاریخ طبری، ج1، ترجمة ابوالقاسم پاینده، تهران: اساطیر.
محمدعلی­خان. (1942). تذکره ذاکرین، حیدرآباد: مطبع مشیر عالم.
مک گوییگان. (1388). بازاندیشی در سیاست فرهنگی، ترجمة نعمت­الله فاضلی و مرتضی قلیچ، تهران: دانشگاه امام­صادق(ع).
معصومی، محسن. (1389). فرهنگ و تمدن ایرانی اسلامی دکن در دورة بهمنیان، تهران: اندیشة معاصر.
منشی قادرخان. (1306ق). تاریخ قطب­شاهی، به اهتمام سیدبرهان­الدین احمد، حیدرآباد دکن: چاپ سنگی.
میرابوالقاسم، رضی‏الدین­بن­نورالدین مخاطب به میر عالم. (1309ق). حدیقه­العالم، به اهتمام سیدعبدالطیف شیرازی، حیدرآباد دکن: چاپ سیدعبداللطیف شیرازی.
نهاوندی، عبدالباقر. (1925). مآثر رحیمی، تصحیح محمد هدایت حسین، کلکته: بی­نا.
کلینی، محمدبن­یعقوب. (1407 ه­ق). الکافی، ج6 ، تهران: دارالکتب الاسلامیه.
هاشم‏خان، محمد. (1925م). منتخب­الباب، تصحیح سرولزلى هیگ، کلکته: به اهتمام انجمن آسیایى بنگاله.
هندوشاه، محمدابن­قاسم و گلشن ابراهیمى. (1301ق). تاریخ فرشته، ج1 و2 ، چاپ­سنگى.
والتیسون،ب. (1396). «بازیگوشی قدرت، تأثیر فرهنگ رسانه­های تولید­کننده- مصرف­کننده»، در قدرت و سیاست فرهنگی در روابط بین­الملل، ویرایش سنگ، جی .چی،ترجمة عسگر قهرمان­پور، تهران: علمی- فرهنگی.
 
Allen. James W (2012). The Art and Architecture of Twelver Shiʿism: Iraq, Iran, and the Indian Sub-Continent. London. Azimuth Editions.
Bhān, S(1939). »Ḥaidarābād kā bādshāhī ʿāshūrkhāna.« Muraqqaʿ-e Dakkan, Special issue of Sab Ras, edited by Muḥyi al-Dīn Qādrī Zore. Ḥaidarābād: Idāra-e Adabīyat-e Urdū.
Dabashi, Hamid (2011). »Taʿziyeh as Theatre of Protest,« The Drama Review .Sainthood, and Everyday Practice in South Asian Shʿism .Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press. Syed Akbar Hyder, Reliving Karbala. Martyrdom in South Asian Memory . New York.  Oxford University Press.
Gray.c(2010). »Analysing cultural policy Incomgibly. plural or Ontologically incompatible?« international  Journal of cultural policy.16 (2).215-230.
Ramey,. Steven.w(2008). Hindu, Sufi, or Sikh: Contested Practices and Identifications of Sindhi Hindus in India and Beyond.New York. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rizvi, S.A.A(1986). History of the Isnā ʿAsharī Shīʿīs in India. New Delhi. Munshiram Manoharlal.
Kevin . Trainor(2010). »Pars Pro Toto: On Comparing Relic Practices,«  Numen.Dehlli. Non12.
Korom, Frank. J (2012). »The Presence of Absence: Using Stuff in a South Asian Sufi Environment,« AAS Working Papers in Social Anthropology.
Meri,Josef. W (2010). »Relics of Piety and Power in Medieval Islam,« Past and Present Supplement, vol 5 .Liden.
Mitchell, Colin paul (2004). »Sister Shiʿa States? Safavid Iran and the Deccan in the 16th Century, «  Deccan Studies.New York.
Minorsky.v, (1995). the qara - qoyunlu and qutb - shahs, bulltin of the school of oriental and African studies, volum 17.
Wheeler, Brannon (2010). »Gift of the Body in Islam: The Prophet Muhammad’s Camel Sacrifice and Distribution of Hair and Nails at His Farewell Pilgrimage,« Numen, Dehlli.
Wheeler, Brannon (2004). »Relics in Islam,« Islamica.Kalkateh.
Naqvi Sadiq (2006), Muslim Religious Institutions and Their Role under the Qutb Shahs. Ḥaidarābād. Bab-ul-Ilm Society.
Naqvi. Shahid (2002). Azādārī .Lahore.Izhar Sons.
Naqvi Sadiq (2006). The ʿĀshūr Khānas of Hyderabad City. Ḥaidarābād: Bab-ul-Ilm Society.
Nayeem, M. A (2006). The Heritage of the Qutb Shahs of Golconda and Hyderabad. Ḥaidarābād. Hyderabad Publishers.
Sassatelli.m(2006). the logic of Europeanizing cultural policy. In Mainhof u.h. Triandafyllidou,  A. (eds) transcultural Europe. London. Palgrave Macmillan.
Subba Reddy, D.V(1962). »Mohammad Quli’s Interest in People’s Health and Medical Aid« . in S. M. Qadri Zore (ed.), Qutb Shahi Sultans and Andhra Samskriti Hyderabad. Idara-e Adabiyat-e Urdu.