نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه سیستان وبلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
2 استاد گروه زبان و ادبیاتفارسی دانشگاه سیستان وبلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Malek Qomi is a Persian-speaking poet of the late 10th and early 11th centuries AH and is considered one of the literary figures of India. Despite benefiting from linguistic and rhetorical features, his collection of ghazals has so far rarely been analyzed from the perspective of rhetorical devices. The aim of this study is to identify different types of īhām (a classical Persian rhetorical device involving semantic ambiguity or double meaning) and analyze their structural and semantic functions in Malek-e Qomi’s ghazals. This research was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method. After a full reading of the ghazals and extraction of examples of īhām, the data were categorized and analyzed based on the types of Īhām. The results show that īhām-e-tanāsob has the highest frequency among the various types of Īhām, followed by īhām-e tazad (Contrastive īhām), īhām-e Do-Gāne-Xāni (Dual Reading), īhām-e tarjomeh (Translational īhām), and īhām-e tabādor (Simultaneous Evocation). The findings indicate that although Malek-e Qomi did not innovate new types of Īhām, he skillfully and diversely used it as a means to enrich meaning, create artistic ambiguity, and establish cohesive links between parts of the poem.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)